Genetic Monogamy in Socially Monogamous Mammals Is Primarily Predicted by Multiple Life History Factors: A Meta-Analysis

作者: Connor T. Lambert , Anne C. Sabol , Nancy G. Solomon

DOI: 10.3389/FEVO.2018.00139

关键词:

摘要: Background We still do not understand the key drivers or prevalence of genetic monogamy in mammals despite amount attention that evolution mammalian has received. There have been numerous reviews hypotheses proposed to explain monogamy, some which focused on animals general, while others particular classes like birds mammals, specific orders within a class. Because is rare overall but relatively common it observed (e.g., Primates, Macroscelidea and Carnivora), provide unique taxon study maintenance However, term ‘monogamy’ encompasses related separate phenomena; i.e., social (pair-living by opposite-sex conspecifics) reproductive (mating exclusivity). A recent review reported 226 species (9%) 9 (35%) were socially monogamous, although monogamous are necessarily genetically monogamous. Methods Since factors predispose be subject debate, we conducted meta-analyses using model selection determine relative importance several life history, demographic environmental predicting monogamy. Results found sufficient data include 41 our analysis, about 2x more than included previous analyses living as part pair versus group was best predictor either itself combination with high levels paternal care. male-biased sex ratio low population density inversely number pairs production intra-pair young litters. Conclusion Our results agree suggest one factor may important driving mammals.

参考文章(84)
David O. Ribble, The evolution of social and reproductive monogamy in Peromyscus, evidence from Peromyscus californicus (the California Mouse) Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans, and other Mammals. pp. 81- 92 ,(2003) , 10.1017/CBO9781139087247.005
Ulrich H. Reichard, Monogamy : past and present Cambridge University Press. pp. 3- 25 ,(2003) , 10.1017/CBO9781139087247.001
Stacey R. Tecot, Britt Singletary, Elizabeth Eadie, Why "monogamy" isn't good enough. American Journal of Primatology. ,vol. 78, pp. 340- 354 ,(2016) , 10.1002/AJP.22412
J. M. Bishop, J. U. M. Jarvis, A. C. Spinks, N. C. Bennett, C. O'Ryan, Molecular insight into patterns of colony composition and paternity in the common mole-rat Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus. Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 13, pp. 1217- 1229 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2004.02131.X
Agustin Fuentes, Patterns and trends in primate pair bonds International Journal of Primatology. ,vol. 23, pp. 953- 978 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1019647514080
Roland Hilgartner, Claudia Fichtel, Peter M Kappeler, Dietmar Zinner, None, Determinants of Pair-Living in Red-Tailed Sportive Lemurs (Lepilemur ruficaudatus). Ethology. ,vol. 118, pp. 466- 479 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2012.02033.X
Hazel J. Nichols, Michael A. Cant, Jennifer L. Sanderson, Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 26, pp. 1486- 1494 ,(2015) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARV095
S. Leclaire, J. F. Nielsen, S. P. Sharp, T. H. Clutton-Brock, Mating strategies in dominant meerkats: evidence for extra-pair paternity in relation to genetic relatedness between pair mates Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 26, pp. 1499- 1507 ,(2013) , 10.1111/JEB.12151