A Selection Bias Approach to Destination Choice

作者: John R. Miron , Lucia Lo

DOI: 10.1111/J.1538-4632.1997.TB00953.X

关键词:

摘要: Research on consumer search behavior commonly envisages destination choice as a two-step process: (1) delineate the set, and (2) evaluate choices therein. However, much of empirical work in choice—including logit nested formulations—models only latter, not set delineation itself. In presence correlation between error terms selection, statistical estimators are biased, problem that Heckman others have called selection bias. this paper, an alternative two-stage method is proposed to estimate parameters models selection. Monte Carlo simulation used explore properties these estimators, show magnitude bias inherent traditional methods estimation.

参考文章(38)
Stephen J. Arnold, Tae H. Oum, Douglas J. Tigert, Determinant Attributes in Retail Patronage: Seasonal, Temporal, Regional, and International Comparisons Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 20, pp. 149- 157 ,(1983) , 10.1177/002224378302000205
David A. Gautschi, Specification of Patronage Models for Retail Center Choice Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 18, pp. 162- 174 ,(1981) , 10.1177/002224378101800204
Neil Wrigley, Quantitative Methods: Developments in Discrete Choice Modelling: Progress in Human Geography. ,vol. 6, pp. 547- 562 ,(1982) , 10.1177/030913258200600404
Charles F. Manski, Ilan Salomon, The demand for teleshopping: An application of discrete choice models Regional Science and Urban Economics. ,vol. 17, pp. 109- 121 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0166-0462(87)90071-8
A. Stewart Fotheringham, Kingsley E. Haynes, The Impact of Space on the Application Of Discrete Choice Models The Review of Regional Studies. ,vol. 20, pp. 39- 49 ,(1990) , 10.52324/001C.9194
W.W. Recker, Discrete choice with an oddball alternative Transportation Research Part B-methodological. ,vol. 29, pp. 201- 211 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00002-U