Reconstruction of the pedicled nasoseptal flap donor site with a contralateral reverse rotation flap: technical modifications and outcomes.

作者: Pornthep Kasemsiri , Ricardo L. Carrau , Bradley A. Otto , Ing Ping Tang , Daniel M. Prevedello

DOI: 10.1002/LARY.24088

关键词:

摘要: Objectives/Hypothesis A pedicled nasoseptal flap is our preferred reconstructive technique after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Its harvesting implies that the donor site (septal cartilage) left bare. Secondary healing leads to crusting at negatively affects patient's quality of life and requires multiple outpatient debridements. A reverse rotation was designed eliminate this problem; however, its outcomes have not been reported. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical charts patients who underwent surgery Wexner Medical Center The Ohio State University from November 2010 September 2012, in whom a used. We analyzed patients' demographics, pathology, regarding flap. Results Forty-nine with various pathologies were included (11 meningiomas, seven craniopharyngiomas, five pituitary macroadenomas, chondrosarcomas, meningoencephaloceles, three chordomas, 11 malignant tumors, two other lesions). There lost follow-up. Mean follow-up time weeks (range = 1–39 weeks). examination 1 2 revealed complete re-epithelialization 46 47 (97.87%). Adverse events granuloma (n = 1), anterior dehiscence excoriated mucosa (n = 1). Factors such as underlying disease, prior chemoradiotherapy, postoperative chemoradiotherapy did seem affect flap. Conclusions The provides remucosalization denuded septum, decreasing septal within first weeks, adds minimal morbidity. Level Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 123:2601–2604, 2013

参考文章(8)
Emiro Caicedo-Granados, Ricardo Carrau, Carl H. Snyderman, Daniel Prevedello, Juan Fernandez-Miranda, Paul Gardner, Amin Kassam, Reverse rotation flap for reconstruction of donor site after vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. ,vol. 120, pp. 1550- 1552 ,(2010) , 10.1002/LARY.20975
Carlos Diogenes Pinheiro-Neto, Daniel M. Prevedello, Ricardo L. Carrau, Carl H. Snyderman, Arlan Mintz, Paul Gardner, Amin Kassam, Improving the design of the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction: a radioanatomic study. Laryngoscope. ,vol. 117, pp. 1560- 1569 ,(2007) , 10.1097/MLG.0B013E31806DB514
Richard J. Harvey, Priscilla Parmar, Raymond Sacks, Adam M. Zanation, Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence Laryngoscope. ,vol. 122, pp. 452- 459 ,(2012) , 10.1002/LARY.22475
Amin B. Kassam, Ajith Thomas, Ricardo L. Carrau, Carl H. Snyderman, Allan Vescan, Daniel Prevedello, Arlan Mintz, Paul Gardner, Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery. ,vol. 63, ,(2008) , 10.1227/01.NEU.0000297074.13423.F5
Amin B. Kassam, Daniel M. Prevedello, Ricardo L. Carrau, Carl H. Snyderman, Ajith Thomas, Paul Gardner, Adam Zanation, Bulent Duz, S. Tonya Stefko, Karin Byers, Michael B. Horowitz, Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: Analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients - A review Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 114, pp. 1544- 1568 ,(2011) , 10.3171/2010.10.JNS09406
Rupali N. Shah, Joshua B. Surowitz, Mihir R. Patel, Benjamin Y. Huang, Carl H. Snyderman, Ricardo L. Carrau, Amin B. Kassam, Anand V. Germanwala, Adam M. Zanation, Endoscopic pedicled nasoseptal flap reconstruction for pediatric skull base defects Laryngoscope. ,vol. 119, pp. 1067- 1075 ,(2009) , 10.1002/LARY.20216
Adam J. Kimple, W. Derek Leight, Stephen A. Wheless, Adam M. Zanation, Reducing nasal morbidity after skull base reconstruction with the nasoseptal flap: free middle turbinate mucosal grafts. Laryngoscope. ,vol. 122, pp. 1920- 1924 ,(2012) , 10.1002/LARY.23325
Gustavo Hadad, Luis Bassagasteguy, Ricardo L. Carrau, Juan C. Mataza, Amin Kassam, Carl H. Snyderman, Arlan Mintz, A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches : Vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap Laryngoscope. ,vol. 116, pp. 1882- 1886 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.MLG.0000234933.37779.E4