Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity, Work Group IV report: triggers for developmental neurotoxicity testing.

作者: Tina E. Levine , Richard E. Butcher

DOI: 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90100-Q

关键词:

摘要: Abstract A Work Group was formed to evaluate the criteria considered important in determining when require developmental neurotoxicity testing animal studies (i.e., triggers for testing). The primary objective of determine whether there is sufficient scientific evidence support identified by Environmental Protection Agency and use structure activity relationships (SAR) trigger automatic certain classes chemicals. weight (WOE) approach recommended order assist which agents should undergo what level testing. Evaluation biological effects, length duration exposure, quality quantity data available on an agent be used WOE approach. Agents that are teratogenic central nervous system (CNS) were highest priority testing, especially if potential a high degree exposure. Neuropathic neuroactive compounds, chemicals with hormone-like activity, toxicants (with effects other than structural abnormalities CNS) also likely candidates such Although reluctant recommend based solely SAR or chemical class, recognized importance considering along toxicity data, pharmacokinetic human exposure making final requirements recommendations further advised more (e.g., standard toxicity, reproductive adult neurotoxicity) developed need little no present environment work place at exposures approaching toxic levels, widespread likely.

参考文章(10)
Ronald Gandelman, Behavioral Teratogenicity of Gonadal and Adrenal Steroids Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 487- 507 ,(1986) , 10.1007/978-1-4613-2189-7_20
D.Cooper Rees, Elaine Z. Francis, Carole A. Kimmel, Scientific and regulatory issues relevant to assessing risk for developmental neurotoxicity: an overview. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. ,vol. 12, pp. 175- 181 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90089-U
Thomas M. Burbacher, Patricia M. Rodier, Bernard Weiss, Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: A comparison of effects in humans and animals Neurotoxicology and Teratology. ,vol. 12, pp. 191- 202 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90091-P
J.Michael Davis, David A. Otto, David E. Weil, Lester D. Grant, The comparative developmental neurotoxicity of lead in humans and animals Neurotoxicology and Teratology. ,vol. 12, pp. 215- 229 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90093-R
Elaine Z. Francis, William H. Farland, Application of the preliminary developmental toxicity screen for chemical hazard identification under the Toxic Substances Control Act. Teratogenesis Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis. ,vol. 7, pp. 107- 117 ,(1987) , 10.1002/TCM.1770070113
C.Phil Comer, Stata Norton, Effects of perinatal methimazole exposure on a developmental test battery for neurobehavioral toxicity in rats. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. ,vol. 63, pp. 133- 141 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0041-008X(82)90032-1
C A Kimmel, J Adams, J Buelke-Sam, Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: implications, current applications and future directions. Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology. ,vol. 7, pp. 669- 673 ,(1985)