Lifetime fitness correlates of natal dispersal distance in a colonial bird

作者: David Serrano , José L. Tella

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2656.2011.01878.X

关键词:

摘要: Summary 1. Obtaining empirical evidence of the consequences dispersal distance on fitness is challenging in wild animals because long-term, unbiased data reproduction, survival and movement are notoriously difficult to obtain. 2. Lifetime correlates natal were studied an isolated population facultatively colonial lesser kestrel Falco naumanni (Fleischer) monitored during 8 years at north-eastern Spain, where most birds (83%) dispersed from their colony settle distances ranging 112 m 136·5 km. 3. Neither annual breeding success nor age recruitment was affected by distance. However, a capture–mark–recapture analysis revealed that year following decreased exponentially with distance, differences up 15% between philopatrics long-distance dispersers. In subsequent years, it remained similar irrespective moved. These results did not seem be biased dispersers settling differentially periphery (which could emigrate permanently considered dead future occasions) or within-individual consistency successive distances, so our appear reflect genuine tactics. 4. Average lifetime fledgling production, average rate-sensitive individual (λind) also first-breeding colony, indicating decisions early life affecting immediate prospects may translate into long-term costs. 5. Both models including continuous significantly improved characterization effect compared considering as discrete process (i.e. vs. philopatry level). 6. Long-distance more likely establish new colonies regardless whether they recruited centre population, revealing important role colonization unoccupied patches. Individuals experienced higher probability mortality small newly funded colonies, costs explained sites quality low high uncertainty prospects.

参考文章(69)
David Serrano, José L. Tella, Manuela G. Forero, José A. Donázar, Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs. conspecific cues Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 70, pp. 568- 578 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.1365-2656.2001.00512.X
Peter M. Waser, Does Competition Drive Dispersal? Ecology. ,vol. 66, pp. 1170- 1175 ,(1985) , 10.2307/1939169
Renée A. Duckworth, Adaptive dispersal strategies and the dynamics of a range expansion. The American Naturalist. ,vol. 172, ,(2008) , 10.1086/588289
David Serrano, Daniel Oro, Esperanza Ursúa, José L. Tella, Colony size selection determines adult survival and dispersal preferences: allee effects in a colonial bird. The American Naturalist. ,vol. 166, ,(2005) , 10.1086/431255
Walter D. Koenig, Dirk Van Vuren, Philip N. Hooge, Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates Trends in Ecology & Evolution. ,vol. 11, pp. 514- 517 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0169-5347(96)20074-6
F. Stephen Dobson, W. Thomas Jones, Multiple causes of dispersal The American Naturalist. ,vol. 126, pp. 855- 858 ,(1985) , 10.1086/284457
Sébastien Devillard, Yves Bray, Assessing the effect on survival of natal dispersal using multistate capture–recapture models Ecology. ,vol. 90, pp. 2902- 2912 ,(2009) , 10.1890/08-0559.1