Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection
作者： Tanja Perko , Michiel Van Oudheusden , Catrinel Turcanu , Christiane Pölzl-Viol , Deborah Oughton
关键词:
摘要: Reflecting a change in funding strategies for European research projects, and commitment to the idea of responsible innovation radiological protection (RP), collective institutes universities have developed prospective Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) Social Sciences Humanities (SSH) protection. This is first time such agenda has been proposed. paper identifies six lines interest concern: (1) Effects social, psychological economic aspects on RP behaviour; (2) Holistic approaches governance risks; (3) Responsible RP; (4) Stakeholder engagement participatory processes research, development, policy practice; (5) Risk communication; (6) cultures. These topics were through broad stakeholder consultation, conjunction with activities carried out framework various projects initiatives (EU H2020 CONCERT programme, EU FP7 OPERRA, PREPARE EAGLE, 2015-2018 RICOMET series conferences, 2014 2016 International Symposia Ethics Environmental Health); as well dialogues members radiation communities. The open opportunities integrate range key social ethical considerations into RP, thereby expanding programmes fostering collaborative innovation.
harvard.edu
sci-hub.se 参考文章(28)
Paul Slovic, James Flynn, C. K. Mertz, Marc Poumadère, Claire Mays, Nuclear Power and the Public Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 55- 102 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_2
Jantine Schröder, Anne Bergmans, Erik Laes, Advanced research, lagging policy: nuclear waste governance in Belgium Governance of nuclear waste management : an international comparison / Brunnengräber, Achim [edit.]; et al.. pp. 141- 155 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-3-658-08962-7_6
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Carol L. Silva, Matthew C. Nowlin, Grant deLozier, Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility Risk Analysis. ,vol. 31, pp. 629- 644 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2010.01543.X
H Friedrich-Nel, None, Radiographers' opinion on patients' rights to informed consent : results of an online survey : peer reviewed original article The South African Radiographer. ,vol. 53, pp. 27- 32 ,(2015)
Vivianne H. M. Visschers, Michael Siegrist, How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 33, pp. 333- 347 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2012.01861.X
Lennart Sjoberg*, Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository Risk Analysis. ,vol. 24, pp. 737- 749 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0272-4332.2004.00472.X
Tanja Perko, Nadja Železnik, Catrinel Turcanu, Peter Thijssen, Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries. Health Physics. ,vol. 102, pp. 614- 625 ,(2012) , 10.1097/HP.0B013E31823FB5A5
Tanja Perko, Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. ,vol. 133, pp. 86- 91 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JENVRAD.2013.04.005
R. Owen, P. Macnaghten, J. Stilgoe, Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society Science and Public Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 751- 760 ,(2012) , 10.1093/SCIPOL/SCS093
Marjan Malešič, Iztok Prezelj, Jelena Juvan, Marko Polič, Samo Uhan, Evacuation in the event of a nuclear disaster: Planned activity or improvisation? International journal of disaster risk reduction. ,vol. 12, pp. 102- 111 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2014.12.005