Ultimate and proximate mechanisms underlying the occurrence of bears close to human settlements: review and management implications

作者: Marcus Elfström , Andreas Zedrosser , Ole-Gunnar Støen , Jon E. Swenson

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2907.2012.00223.X

关键词:

摘要: Large carnivores (LCs), such as bears (Ursidae), are commonly believed to occur near human settlements because they have a learned tolerance of humans (human habituation) and associate with accessible high-quality foods (food conditioning). Young females cubs often overrepresented among ‘problem’ settlements. We review the mechanisms underlying occurrence brown black (Ursus arctos, Ursus americanus, thibetanus) settlements, consider four hypotheses designed separate ultimate proximate mechanisms. Increased people or can be explained by (i) habituation hypothesis; increased use human-derived (ii) food-conditioning hypothesis. However, both proximate, only apply if earlier experience and/or food. A lack explain younger settlements: (iii) naivety This is mechanism, movements naive typically triggered aggression competition conspecifics. We conclude that disproportionate in certain sex, age reproductive classes predation avoidance interference competition, i.e. (iv) despotic distribution Therefore, must an mechanism causing conditioning. Thus, using refuges should not considered ‘unnatural’, but rather exhibiting adaptive behaviour, conspecifics. Management LCs includes attractant management, counteract food conditioning, failure behaviour conspecifics may lead treating symptom, e.g. The cause attraction specific identified considering type bear involved; large solitary suggests attractive habitat shortage remote areas, whereas subadults suggest lower-quality habitat.

参考文章(131)
C.L. Roever, M.S. Boyce, G.B. Stenhouse, Grizzly bears and forestry: II: Grizzly bear habitat selection and conflicts with road placement Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 256, pp. 1262- 1269 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2008.06.006
Alan R. Armistead, Guy E. Connolly, Ken Mitchell, BEAR RELOCATIONS TO AVOID BEAR/SHEEP CONFLICTS Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 16, ,(1994)
Philip D. Mcloughlin, Steven H. Ferguson, François Messier, Intraspecific Variation in Home Range Overlap with Habitat Quality: A Comparison among Brown Bear Populations Evolutionary Ecology. ,vol. 14, pp. 39- 60 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1011019031766
Klaus Immelmann, A Dictionary of Ethology ,(1989)
Donald G. Whittaker, Gary W. Witmer, DEALING WITH NUISANCE AND DEPREDATING BLACK BEARS ,(2001)
M. A. Ahlering, J. J. Millspaugh, R. J. Woods, D. Western, L. S. Eggert, Elevated levels of stress hormones in crop‐raiding male elephants Animal Conservation. ,vol. 14, pp. 124- 130 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2010.00400.X
Stephen Dewitt Fretwell, Henry L. Lucas, On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds Acta Biotheoretica. ,vol. 19, pp. 37- 44 ,(1969) , 10.1007/BF01601953
B. J. Macbeth, M.R.L. Cattet, G. B. Stenhouse, M. L. Gibeau, D. M. Janz, Hair cortisol concentration as a noninvasive measure of long-term stress in free-ranging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos): considerations with implications for other wildlife Canadian Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 88, pp. 935- 949 ,(2010) , 10.1139/Z10-057
Andrés Ordiz, Ole-Gunnar Støen, Jon E. Swenson, Ilpo Kojola, Richard Bischof, DISTANCE‐DEPENDENT EFFECT OF THE NEAREST NEIGHBOR: SPATIOTEMPORAL PATTERNS IN BROWN BEAR REPRODUCTION Ecology. ,vol. 89, pp. 3327- 3335 ,(2008) , 10.1890/07-1921.1