EU's Conservation Efforts Need More Strategic Investment to Meet Continental Commitments

作者: Virgilio Hermoso , Miguel Clavero , Dani Villero , Lluís Brotons

DOI: 10.1111/CONL.12248

关键词:

摘要: The European Union (EU) has made significant conservation efforts in the last two decades, guided by Birds and Habitats Directives, currently under evaluation. Despite these a large proportion of priority species are still in unfavorable condition continue declining. For this reason, thoughtful review implementation Europe is needed to identify potential causes behind poor effectiveness. We compiled information on distribution all funds LIFE-Nature, the main financial tool for Europe. found that LIFE-Nature has not adequately covered continental needs. majority of funds have been directed toward nonthreatened or regions low conservation priority. Given limited resources available, two key aspects are in urgent need revision improvement. First, funds should be global needs planned at the EU scale. Second, new mechanisms required to set priorities in dynamic fashion, rather than relying on fixed lists (i.e., Directives’ Annexes) may rapidly become outdated. These improvements would require new priorities redistribution efforts, supported adequate policy more effective top-down control on investment.

参考文章(16)
PEDRO CARDOSO, Habitats Directive species lists: urgent need of revision Insect Conservation and Diversity. ,vol. 5, pp. 169- 174 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1752-4598.2011.00140.X
Philip E. Hulme, Petr Pyšek, Wolfgang Nentwig, Montserrat Vilà, Will Threat of Biological Invasions Unite the European Union Science. ,vol. 324, pp. 40- 41 ,(2009) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1171111
Vassiliki Kati, Tasos Hovardas, Martin Dieterich, Pierre L. Ibisch, Barbara Mihok, Nuria Selva, The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 260- 270 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12366
Atte Moilanen, Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools Oxford University Press. pp. 1- 304 ,(2009)
Fiona J. Sanderson, Robert G. Pople, Christina Ieronymidou, Ian J. Burfield, Richard D. Gregory, Stephen G. Willis, Christine Howard, Philip A. Stephens, Alison E. Beresford, Paul F. Donald, Assessing the Performance of EU Nature Legislation in Protecting Target Bird Species in an Era of Climate Change Conservation Letters. ,vol. 9, pp. 172- 180 ,(2016) , 10.1111/CONL.12196
Axel Hochkirch, Thomas Schmitt, Joscha Beninde, Marietta Hiery, Tim Kinitz, Jenny Kirschey, Daniela Matenaar, Katja Rohde, Aleke Stoefen, Norman Wagner, Andreas Zink, Stefan Lötters, Michael Veith, Alexander Proelss, Europe Needs a New Vision for a Natura 2020 Network Conservation Letters. ,vol. 6, pp. 462- 467 ,(2013) , 10.1111/CONL.12006
S. Kark, N. Levin, H. S. Grantham, H. P. Possingham, Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 106, pp. 15368- 15373 ,(2009) , 10.1073/PNAS.0901001106
Klaus Henle, Bianca Bauch, Mark Auliya, Mart Külvik, Guy Pe‘er, Dirk S. Schmeller, Erik Framstad, Priorities for biodiversity monitoring in Europe: A review of supranational policies and a novel scheme for integrative prioritization Ecological Indicators. ,vol. 33, pp. 5- 18 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.03.028
Michael R. W. Rands, William M. Adams, Leon Bennun, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Andrew Clements, David Coomes, Abigail Entwistle, Ian Hodge, Valerie Kapos, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann, William J. Sutherland, Bhaskar Vira, Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science. ,vol. 329, pp. 1298- 1303 ,(2010) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1189138