The psychology of inferring conditionals from disjunctions: A probabilistic study

作者: Angelo Gilio , David Over

DOI: 10.1016/J.JMP.2012.02.006

关键词:

摘要: Abstract There is a new probabilistic paradigm in the psychology of reasoning that is, part, based on results showing people judge probability natural language conditional, if A then B , P ( i f t h e n ) to be conditional probability, ∣ . We apply this approach study very common inference form ordinary reasoning: inferring not - from disjunction or show how can strong, with “close to” o r when non-constructively justified. When constructively justified, weak. also define suitable measures “closeness” and “constructivity”, by providing analysis these notions.

参考文章(42)
Bruno de Finetti, Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources Springer, New York, NY. pp. 134- 174 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_10
Frank Plumpton Ramsey, General Propositions and Causality Kegan Paul, Trench & Trubner. ,(1931)
David E. Over, Jonathan St. B.T. Evans, Shira Elqayam, Conditionals and non-constructive reasoning Cognition and ConditionalsProbability and Logic in Human Thinking. pp. 135- 152 ,(2010) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199233298.003.0008
Ernest Wilcox Adams, A primer of probability logic ,(1996)
Michael A. E. Dummett, Elements of Intuitionism ,(2000)
Angelo Gilio, Probabilistic Reasoning Under Coherence in System P Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 34, pp. 5- 34 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1014422615720
Jonathan Francis Bennett, A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals ,(2003)
Brian M. Foss, New Horizons in Psychology 1 ,(1966)
Stephen Read, Dorothy Edgington, Conditionals and the Ramsey Test Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 69, pp. 47- 86 ,(1995) , 10.1093/ARISTOTELIANSUPP/69.1.47