Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates

作者: Richard Grenyer , C David L Orme , Sarah F Jackson , Gavin H Thomas , Richard G Davies

DOI: 10.1038/NATURE05237

关键词:

摘要: 'Silver bullet' conservation strategies assume that the distribution of extinction-prone species in one well studied taxonomic group will predict comparable other groups. This has been hard to test, but availability new databases on global birds, mammals and amphibians means a test is now possible. The three groups show similar patterns terms overall richness, threatened rare different each group. Silver bullet alone, it seems, miss target. Instead, priority areas for biodiversity must be based high-resolution data from multiple taxa. 'Silver-bullet' approaches strategy can or two known groups, as there high cross-taxon congruence large-scale biodiversity. Although found Global commonly congruent geographical diversity, therefore act surrogate vulnerable when decisions are being made1,2,3,4. validity these assumptions remains unclear, however, because previous tests have limited both extent5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Here we use database 19,349 living bird, mammal amphibian that, although richness very among markedly lower. Congruence especially low rarest species. Cross-taxon also highly scale dependent, particularly at finer spatial resolutions relevant real protected areas. ‘Hotspots’ rarity threat largely non-overlapping across chosen maximize complementarity. Overall, our results indicate ‘silver-bullet’ alone not deliver efficient solutions.

参考文章(23)
Peter C. Howard, Paolo Viskanic, Tim R. B. Davenport, Fred W. Kigenyi, Michael Baltzer, Chris J. Dickinson, Jeremiah S. Lwanga, Roger A. Matthews, Andrew Balmford, Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda Nature. ,vol. 394, pp. 472- 475 ,(1998) , 10.1038/28843
Craig Hilton-Taylor, S. N. Stuart, Jonathan Baillie, 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species : a global species assessment IUCN-The World Conservation Union. ,(2004)
J. H. Lawton, D. E. Bignell, B. Bolton, G. F. Bloemers, P. Eggleton, P. M. Hammond, M. Hodda, R. D. Holt, T. B. Larsen, N. A. Mawdsley, N. E. Stork, D. S. Srivastava, A. D. Watt, Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest Nature. ,vol. 391, pp. 72- 76 ,(1998) , 10.1038/34166
David M. Olson, Eric Dinerstein, The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. ,vol. 89, pp. 199- 224 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3298564
Peter Clifford, Sylvia Richardson, Denis Hemon, None, Assessing the Significance of the Correlation between Two Spatial Processes Biometrics. ,vol. 45, pp. 123- 134 ,(1989) , 10.2307/2532039
John F. Lamoreux, John C. Morrison, Taylor H. Ricketts, David M. Olson, Eric Dinerstein, Meghan W. McKnight, Herman H. Shugart, Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism Nature. ,vol. 440, pp. 212- 214 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NATURE04291
R.L. Pressey, C.J. Humphries, C.R. Margules, R.I. Vane-Wright, P.H. Williams, Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 8, pp. 124- 128 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-I
C. David L. Orme, Richard G. Davies, Malcolm Burgess, Felix Eigenbrod, Nicola Pickup, Valerie A. Olson, Andrea J. Webster, Tzung-Su Ding, Pamela C. Rasmussen, Robert S. Ridgely, Ali J. Stattersfield, Peter M. Bennett, Tim M. Blackburn, Kevin J. Gaston, Ian P. F. Owens, Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat Nature. ,vol. 436, pp. 1016- 1019 ,(2005) , 10.1038/NATURE03850
Kerrie A. Wilson, Marissa F. McBride, Michael Bode, Hugh P. Possingham, Prioritizing global conservation efforts Nature. ,vol. 440, pp. 337- 340 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NATURE04366