Conservation Performance Payments for Carnivore Conservation in Sweden

作者: ASTRID ZABEL , KARIN HOLM-MÜLLER

DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2008.00898.X

关键词: Moral hazardBusinessLivelihoodAgricultural landNatural resource economicsTransparency (market)PopulationCarnivoreLivestockEnvironmental protectionWildlife

摘要: Many carnivores require vast territories, and as human population increases, more pristine natural areas are being developed converted into agricultural land. Unsurprisingly, that live at the fringe between wild land occasionally prey on livestock. Predation of livestock can result in severe economic losses (Mishra 1997; Thirgood et al. 2005; Woodroffe 2005). Herders, whose livelihoods depend livestock, often seek to kill predators prevent further damage. Conservationists, other hand, engage measures protect endangered because they appreciated an important component biodiversity. Viable solutions make coexistence wildlife acceptable conservationists owners much needed likely be increasingly sought after sprawl increases. Schemes provide ex post compensation for predation have been implemented many places around world, but not proven widely successful. Most schemes’ deficiencies ascribed one or several following problems: moral hazard (Cozza 1996; Swenson & Andren 2005), high transaction costs (Saberwal 1994; Blanco 2003), long time lags (Fourli 1999; Madhusudan problems trust transparency (Montag 2002; Western Waithaka Mainly due these problems, practitioners analysts denounced schemes inadequate, fraudulent, cumbersome (Naughton-Treves 2003). Drawing empirical insights a conservation performance-payment scheme Sweden, we

参考文章(17)
Rosie Woodroffe, Alan Rabinowitz, Simon Thirgood, People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence? ,(2005)
Simon Thirgood, Rosie Woodroffe, Alan Rabinowitz, People and Wildlife: The impact of human–wildlife conflict on human lives and livelihoods Cambridge University Press. pp. 13- 26 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.003
David Western, John Waithaka, People and Wildlife: Policies for reducing human–wildlife conflict: a Kenya case study Cambridge University Press. pp. 357- 372 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.023
Rosie Woodroffe, Peter Lindsey, Stephanie Romañach, Andrew Stein, Symon M.K. ole Ranah, Livestock predation by endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in northern Kenya Biological Conservation. ,vol. 124, pp. 225- 234 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2005.01.028
Jens Persson, Female wolverine (Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability Canadian Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1453- 1459 ,(2005) , 10.1139/Z05-143
Katherine Cozza, Rosario Fico, Maria-Luisa Battistini, Elizabeth Rogers, The damage-conservation interface illustrated by predation on domestic livestock in central Italy Biological Conservation. ,vol. 78, pp. 329- 336 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00053-5
Vasant K. Saberwal, James P. Gibbs, Ravi Chellam, A.J.T. Johnsingh, Lion‐Human Conflict in the Gir Forest, India Conservation Biology. ,vol. 8, pp. 501- 507 ,(1994) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1994.08020501.X
P. J. Ferraro, ECOLOGY: Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity Science. ,vol. 298, pp. 1718- 1719 ,(2002) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1078104