Effect of Computer-Aided Detection on Independent Double Reading of Paired Screen-Film and Full-Field Digital Screening Mammograms
作者： Per Skaane , Ashwini Kshirsagar , Sandra Stapleton , Kari Young , Ronald A. Castellino
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.2207
关键词: Radiology 、 Digital mammography 、 Mammography 、 Rating scale 、 Mass screening 、 Full field 、 Medicine 、 Gynecology 、 Double reading 、 Breast cancer 、 Computer aided detection
摘要: OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution computer-aided detection (CAD) independent double reading paired screen-film full-field digital screening mammograms.MATERIALS AND METHODS. cases 3,683 women who underwent both mammography (FFDM) with for each technique were followed 2 years include cancers detected in interval between rounds at next round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven diagnosed. baseline mammograms 55 defined as having positive findings if least one two readers scored it or higher on a 5-point rating scale. (n = 10) secondround 16) retrospectively classified overlooked 2), minimal sign actionable 8), nonactionable 5), normal 11). basel...
sci-hub.se 参考文章(40)
U. Fischer, F. Baum, S. Obenauer, S. Luftner-Nagel, D. von Heyden, R. Vosshenrich, E. Grabbe, Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. European Radiology. ,vol. 12, pp. 2679- 2683 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00330-002-1354-X
R. Schulz-Wendtland, K.-P. Hermann, T. Wacker, W. Bautz, Aktueller Stand und weitere Perspektiven der digitalen Mammographie Radiologe. ,vol. 48, pp. 324- 334 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00117-008-1639-4
Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Michael J. Schell, Richard E. Bird, David A. Desrochers, Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 177, pp. 535- 541 ,(2001) , 10.2214/AJR.177.3.1770535
M.J.M. Broeders, N.C. Onland-Moret, H.J.T.M. Rijken, J.H.C.L. Hendriks, A.L.M. Verbeek, R. Holland, Use of previous screening mammograms to identify features indicating cases that would have a possible gain in prognosis following earlier detection. European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 39, pp. 1770- 1775 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00311-3
S Ciatto, M Rosselli Del Turco, P Burke, C Visioli, E Paci, M Zappa, Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 89, pp. 1645- 1649 ,(2003) , 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6601356
J. Dinnes, S. Moss, J. Melia, R. Blanks, F. Song, J. Kleijnen, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review The Breast. ,vol. 10, pp. 455- 463 ,(2001) , 10.1054/BRST.2001.0350
Joann G. Elmore, Carolyn K. Wells, Carol H. Lee, Debra H. Howard, Alvan R. Feinstein, Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of Mammograms The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 331, pp. 1493- 1499 ,(1994) , 10.1056/NEJM199412013312206
Robyn L. Birdwell, Parul Bandodkar, Debra M. Ikeda, Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology. ,vol. 236, pp. 451- 457 ,(2005) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2362040864
Paul Taylor, Henry W.W. Potts, Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 44, pp. 798- 807 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2008.02.016
Xiaolan Zeng, Sarah Medeiros, Susan A Wood, Sandra Stapleton, Jimmy Roehrig, Kathryn O'Shaughnessy, Ronald A Castellino, Computer-aided detection for mammography: improved algorithm performance with operator determined points characterized by new metrics computer assisted radiology and surgery. ,vol. 1268, pp. 855- 860 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ICS.2004.03.175