The Contributions of the EU Nature Directives to the CBD and Other Multilateral Environmental Agreements

作者: Alison E. Beresford , Graeme M. Buchanan , Fiona J. Sanderson , Rebecca Jefferson , Paul F. Donald

DOI: 10.1111/CONL.12259

关键词: Ecosystem servicesConvention on Biological DiversityBirds DirectiveNatura 2000Environmental resource managementEuropean unionInternational tradeRamsar ConventionBiodiversityPopulationBusiness

摘要: Through a review of published studies and new analyses publicly available data, we assess how the European Union (EU) Nature Directives complements CBD strategic goals for 2020 as set out in 20 Aichi Targets, thereby addressing question posed by Commission about coherence with other international biodiversity commitments. We find evidence that complement several Targets Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). For example, 92% EU's Important Bird Biodiversity Areas (IBAs), many them otherwise unprotected, are partly or wholly covered Natura 2000 network protected areas (contributing to Target 11). Species listed on Annex I Birds Directive have fared better than species (Aichi 12). As 65% EU citizens live within 5 km site, 98% km, these sites potential raise awareness 1) deliver ecosystem services high proportion population 14). The provide regulatory framework that, fuller implementation, will help Member States meet their obligations under MEAs.

参考文章(29)
Ian Burfield, Franz van Bommel, Birds in Europe : population estimates, trends and conservation status Published in <b>2004</b> in Cambridge by BirdLife international. ,(2004)
Francisco J. Bonet-García, Antonio J. Pérez-Luque, Ricardo A. Moreno-Llorca, Ramón Pérez-Pérez, Carolina Puerta-Piñero, Regino Zamora, Protected areas as elicitors of human well-being in a developed region: A new synthetic (socioeconomic) approach Biological Conservation. ,vol. 187, pp. 221- 229 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.04.027
S. Brodier, S. Augiron, T. Cornulier, V. Bretagnolle, Local improvement of skylark and corn bunting population trends on intensive arable landscape: a case study of the conservation tool Natura 2000 Animal Conservation. ,vol. 17, pp. 204- 216 ,(2014) , 10.1111/ACV.12077
Joana Santana, Luís Reino, Chris Stoate, Rui Borralho, Carlos Rio Carvalho, Stefan Schindler, Francisco Moreira, Miguel N. Bugalho, Paulo Flores Ribeiro, José Lima Santos, Alexandre Vaz, Rui Morgado, Miguel Porto, Pedro Beja, Mixed Effects of Long-Term Conservation Investment in Natura 2000 Farmland Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 467- 477 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12077
V. Pellissier, J. Touroult, R. Julliard, J. P. Siblet, F. Jiguet, Assessing the Natura 2000 network with a common breeding birds survey Animal Conservation. ,vol. 16, pp. 566- 574 ,(2013) , 10.1111/ACV.12030
Fiona J. Sanderson, Robert G. Pople, Christina Ieronymidou, Ian J. Burfield, Richard D. Gregory, Stephen G. Willis, Christine Howard, Philip A. Stephens, Alison E. Beresford, Paul F. Donald, Assessing the Performance of EU Nature Legislation in Protecting Target Bird Species in an Era of Climate Change Conservation Letters. ,vol. 9, pp. 172- 180 ,(2016) , 10.1111/CONL.12196
Axel Hochkirch, Thomas Schmitt, Joscha Beninde, Marietta Hiery, Tim Kinitz, Jenny Kirschey, Daniela Matenaar, Katja Rohde, Aleke Stoefen, Norman Wagner, Andreas Zink, Stefan Lötters, Michael Veith, Alexander Proelss, Europe Needs a New Vision for a Natura 2020 Network Conservation Letters. ,vol. 6, pp. 462- 467 ,(2013) , 10.1111/CONL.12006
Zdenka Křenová, Pavel Kindlmann, Natura 2000 – Solution for Eastern Europe or just a good start? The Šumava National Park as a test case Biological Conservation. ,vol. 186, pp. 268- 275 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.03.028
M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, J. R. G. Townshend, High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change Science. ,vol. 342, pp. 850- 853 ,(2013) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1244693