Methane Production from Feather Waste Pretreated with Ca(OH) 2 : Process Development and Economical Analysis

作者: Gergely Forgács , Claes Niklasson , Ilona Sárvári Horváth , Mohammad J. Taherzadeh

DOI: 10.1007/S12649-013-9221-3

关键词: Environmental scienceResource recoveryBioenergyWaste managementAnaerobic digestionGate feeTotal dissolved solidsBiofuelBiogasRenewable resource

摘要: This study investigated the industrial application of feather waste as a substrate for anaerobic digestion. Feather was pretreated with 0–0.2 Ca(OH)2 g/g TSfeather (total solids feathers) 30–120 min at 100–120 °C, in order to increase digestibility, and enhance methane yield subsequent digestion 55 °C. Based on results batch digestion, an process developed, which can achieve 0.40 Nm3/kg VSfeather (volatile from feathers, while it fulfills animal by-product hygenization requirements well. base case pretreatment designed using SuperPro Designer® utilizing 2,500 tons feathers per year, is stream average slaughterhouse capacity 60,000 broilers day. The production cost estimated be 0.475 EUR/Nm3, investments unit requires 0.97 million EUR total capital investment, 0.25 EUR/year operating cost. However, sensitive plant capacity. Changing 625 10,000 reducing biogas 1.177 0.203 EUR/Nm3. In addition, sensitivity analysis performed investigate effect value incoming overall profitability. showed that proposed investment could considered being financially viable upgraded biomethane even without current gate fee system.

参考文章(28)
Yun Xia, Daniel I. Massé, Tim A. McAllister, Yunhong Kong, Robert Seviour, Carole Beaulieu, Identity and diversity of archaeal communities during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken feathers and other animal wastes Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 110, pp. 111- 119 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.01.107
María José Cuetos, Xiomar Gómez, Marta Otero, Antonio Morán, Anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste (SHW) at laboratory scale: Influence of co-digestion with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) Biochemical Engineering Journal. ,vol. 40, pp. 99- 106 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BEJ.2007.11.019
Martina Poeschl, Shane Ward, Philip Owende, Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 24, pp. 184- 201 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.10.030
Anette Hejnfelt, Irini Angelidaki, Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 33, pp. 1046- 1054 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2009.03.004
N. Tippayawong, P. Thanompongchart, Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor Energy. ,vol. 35, pp. 4531- 4535 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2010.04.014
Guillermo Coward-Kelly, Frank K. Agbogbo, Mark T. Holtzapple, Lime treatment of keratinous materials for the generation of highly digestible animal feed: 2. Animal hair. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 97, pp. 1344- 1352 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2005.05.017
Geun-Tae Park, Hong-Joo Son, Keratinolytic activity of Bacillus megaterium F7-1, a feather-degrading mesophilic bacterium Microbiological Research. ,vol. 164, pp. 478- 485 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.MICRES.2007.02.004
Mikael Lantz, Mattias Svensson, Lovisa Björnsson, Pål Börjesson, The prospects for an expansion of biogas systems in Sweden—Incentives, barriers and potentials Energy Policy. ,vol. 35, pp. 1830- 1843 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2006.05.017
C. Walla, W. Schneeberger, The optimal size for biogas plants Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 32, pp. 551- 557 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2007.11.009