Public participation processes related to nuclear research installations: What are the driving factors behind participation intention?
作者： Catrinel Turcanu , Tanja Perko , Erik Laes
关键词: Public participation 、 Public opinion 、 Public relations 、 Driving factors 、 Social psychology 、 Energy (esotericism) 、 Empirical data 、 Legal norm 、 Psychology
摘要: This article addresses organised public participation processes related to installations for nuclear research. The aim was determine predictors that could provide an empirical insight into the motivations underlying people's intended level of involvement. results highlight attitude towards and moral norm as strongest intention. Other significant were time constraints, energy, subjective descriptive norms, knowledge. An opposing relationship is noted between intention energy. At same time, people who are more knowledgeable about domain seem willing get involved. analysis also revealed financial benefits do not influence involvement in research installations. reported here based on data from a large-scale opinion survey (N = 1020) carried out Belgium during May-June 2011.
sagepub.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(38)
Marshall H. Becker, The Health Belief Model and Sick Role Behavior Health Education & Behavior. ,vol. 2, pp. 409- 419 ,(1974) , 10.1177/109019817400200407
Michael A. Xenos, Amy B. Becker, Ashley A. Anderson, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Stimulating Upstream Engagement: An Experimental Study of Nanotechnology Information Seeking Social Science Quarterly. ,vol. 92, pp. 1191- 1214 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1540-6237.2011.00814.X
Alan Irwin, Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 18 ,(2001) , 10.3109/A036852
Andrea Retzbach, Joachim Marschall, Marion Rahnke, Lukas Otto, Michaela Maier, Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 6231- 6244 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11051-011-0582-X
Laurie Chassin, Clark C. Presson, Steven J. Sherman, Eric Corty, Richard W. Olshavsky, Predicting the Onset of Cigarette Smoking in Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study Journal of Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 14, pp. 224- 243 ,(1984) , 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1984.TB02233.X
Wouter Poortinga, Nick F. Pidgeon, Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation Risk Analysis. ,vol. 23, pp. 961- 972 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1539-6924.00373
Marco C. Yzer, Joseph N. Cappella, Martin Fishbein, Robert Hornik, Sarah Sayeed, R. Kirkland Ahern, The role of distal variables in behavior change: Effects of adolescents' risk for marijuana use on intention to use marijuana Journal of Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 34, pp. 1229- 1250 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02005.X
Tanja Perko, Nadja Železnik, Catrinel Turcanu, Peter Thijssen, Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries. Health Physics. ,vol. 102, pp. 614- 625 ,(2012) , 10.1097/HP.0B013E31823FB5A5
Pius Krütli, Michael Stauffacher, Thomas Flüeler, Roland W. Scholz, Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories Journal of Risk Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 861- 875 ,(2010) , 10.1080/13669871003703252
Edward L. Deci, Richard Koestner, Richard M. Ryan, A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 125, pp. 627- 668 ,(1999) , 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627