Brain dopamine and noradrenaline levels in rats submitted to four different aversive behavioral tests.

作者: Romeu A. Sch�tz , Maria T. Barros Sch�tz , Otto A. Orsingher , Ivan Izquierdo

DOI: 10.1007/BF00433564

关键词: BuzzerStimulus (physiology)Nucleus accumbensPsychologyDopamineCaudate nucleusHypothalamusNeuroscienceClassical conditioningAmygdala

摘要: Rats were trained to perform shuttle responses a buzzer in four different situations: Pseudoconditioning (buzzers and footshocks presented at random), classical conditioning footulus paired on every trial), avoidance without stimulus pairing (buzzer-shock intervals varied random, shocks contingent upon the nonemission of response preceding buzzer), standard two-way shocks, but latter omitted time there was buzzer). Animals killed immediately after last trials noradrenaline dopamine content their hypothalamus, amygdala, caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens determined. There falls levels all structures except pseudoconditioning test. Noradrenaline normal, partially recovered, animals submitted other training situations. Thus learning factors (stimulus and/or contingency) offset depleting influence per se both catecholamines least studied.

参考文章(27)
Hymie Anisman, Neurochemical Changes Elicited by Stress Springer US. pp. 119- 172 ,(1978) , 10.1007/978-1-4684-2394-5_3
Arnold J. Friedhoff, Catecholamines and Behavior ,(1975)
Burrhus F. Skinner, Science and human behavior ,(1953)
Robert Lee Isaacson, The limbic system ,(1974)
Seymour Levine, Robert L. Conner, Jack D. Barchas, Jon M. Stolk, BRAIN NOREPINEPHRINE METABOLISM AND SHOCK-INDUCED FIGHTING BEHAVIOR IN RATS: DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF SHOCK AND FIGHTING ON THE NEUROCHEMICAL RESPONSE TO A COMMON FOOTSHOCK STIMULUS Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. ,vol. 190, pp. 193- 209 ,(1974)
Ivan Izquierdo, Effect on pseudoconditioning of drugs with known central nervous activity. Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 38, pp. 259- 266 ,(1974) , 10.1007/BF00421378