Why Namibian Farmers Are Satisfied With the Performance of Their Livestock Guarding Dogs

作者: Gail C. Potgieter , Laurie L. Marker , Nico L. Avenant , Graham I. H. Kerley

DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2013.803211

关键词: LivestockWildlifeSubsistence agricultureBusinessEnvironmental resource managementHuman–wildlife conflictSocioeconomics

摘要: The success of livestock guarding dogs (LGDs) in mitigating farmer–predator conflict relies on the perceptions farmers that use them. Purebred LGDs are provided to Namibian by Cheetah Conservation Fund as a mitigation measure. We examined using 164 these analyzing data collected during face-to-face interviews from 2000–2010. Although most respondents reported reduced losses since LGD introduction, satisfaction with performance was more strongly linked their observations behavior. commonly negative behaviors were staying home (29 LGDs, 18%) and chasing wildlife (25 15%). On subsistence farms, care negatively correlated age (r = −.34, n = 35, p = .04) reportedly less than other LGDs. Overall, performed satisfactorily commercial thus contributed mitigation.

参考文章(31)
Luke Hunter, Cheetah survival on Namibian farmlands, L. Marker-Kraus, D. Kraus, D. Barnett, S. Hurlbut : book review South African Journal of Wildlife Research - 24-month delayed open access. ,vol. 27, pp. 78- ,(1997)
William F. Andelt, Stuart N. Hopper, Livestock guard dogs reduce predation on domestic sheep in Colorado. Journal of Range Management. ,vol. 53, pp. 259- 267 ,(2000) , 10.2307/4003429
Lorna Coppinger, Jay R. Lorenz, Raising and training a livestock-guarding dog Corvallis, Or. : Extension Service, Oregon State University. ,(1996)
A. B. Stein, T. K. Fuller, D. T. Damery, L. Sievert, L. L. Marker, Farm management and economic analyses of leopard conservation in north‐central Namibia Animal Conservation. ,vol. 13, pp. 419- 427 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2010.00364.X
Julie a. Richardson, Wildlife utilization and biodiversity conservation in Namibia: conflicting or complementaryobjectives? Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 7, pp. 549- 559 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008883813644
Simon Thirgood, Rosie Woodroffe, Alan Rabinowitz, People and Wildlife: The impact of human–wildlife conflict on human lives and livelihoods Cambridge University Press. pp. 13- 26 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.003
Urs Breitenmoser, Christof Angst, Jean-Marc Landry, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, John D. C. Linnell, Jean-Marc Weber, People and Wildlife: Non-lethal techniques for reducing depredation Cambridge University Press. pp. 49- 71 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.005
Kate Graham, Andrew P. Beckerman, Simon Thirgood, Human–predator–prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management Biological Conservation. ,vol. 122, pp. 159- 171 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2004.06.006