GUIDING THE SWITCH FROM TRIANGLE TESTING TO TETRAD TESTING: TRIANGLE TO TETRAD

作者: JOHN M. ENNIS

DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-459X.2012.00386.X

关键词:

摘要: ABSTRACT Tetrad testing is theoretically more powerful than Triangle testing, yet the addition of a fourth stimulus raises questions – it possible that places such an additional demand on subjects theoretical advantage Tetrad test lost. In this paper, we provide guideline to compare results and Triangle. Specifically, roughly correct say as long effect sizes do not drop by one third for same stimuli, then remains test. We explain in terms perceptual noise, illustrate its use several examples discuss statistical considerations accompany use. To assist with evaluation, table finding variance Tetrad-based measurement size. Finally, show how Thurstonian framework helps us improve discrimination efficiency even when seek power. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Discrimination programs based might be made sensitive or efficient testing. This paper develops sensory scientists who are considering switch from The displays examples, discusses relevant considerations, provides helpful demonstrates theory can used already successful program.

参考文章(53)
JOHN M. ENNIS, VIRGINIE JESIONKA, THE POWER OF SENSORY DISCRIMINATION METHODS REVISITED Journal of Sensory Studies. ,vol. 26, pp. 371- 382 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1745-459X.2011.00353.X
JIAN BI, HYE-SEONG LEE, MICHAEL O'MAHONY, d′ and variance of d′ for four-alternative forced choice (4-AFC). Journal of Sensory Studies. ,vol. 25, pp. 740- 750 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1745-459X.2010.00301.X
KAREN GARCIA, JOHN M. ENNIS, WITOON PRINYAWIWATKUL, A LARGE-SCALE EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THE TETRAD AND TRIANGLE TESTS IN CHILDREN: COMPARISON OF TETRAD AND TRIANGLE Journal of Sensory Studies. ,vol. 27, pp. 217- 222 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1745-459X.2012.00385.X
Susan Tedja, Ryuichi Nonaka, Daniel M. Ennis, Michael O'Mahony, Triadic discrimination testing: refinement of Thurstonian and Sequential Sensitivity Analysis approaches Chemical Senses. ,vol. 19, pp. 279- 301 ,(1994) , 10.1093/CHEMSE/19.4.279
Daniel M. Ennis, Kenneth Mullen, A multivariate model for discrimination methods Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 206- 219 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90014-3
Benoı̂t Rousseau, Michel Rogeaux, Michael O'Mahony, Mustard discrimination by same–different and triangle tests: aspects of irritation, memory and τ criteria Food Quality and Preference. ,vol. 10, pp. 173- 184 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00015-4
John M. Ennis, Daniel M. Ennis, Dorene Yip, Michael O'Mahony, Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetrads British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. ,vol. 51, pp. 205- 215 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.2044-8317.1998.TB00677.X
Samantha Lau, Michael O’mahony, Benoît Rousseau, Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination Perception & Psychophysics. ,vol. 66, pp. 464- 474 ,(2004) , 10.3758/BF03194894