Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-setting: From Abstract Principles to Complex Practice

作者: Loes Knaapen , Pascale Lehoux

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2015.1125875

关键词:

摘要: AbstractClinical practice guidelines have been critiqued for prescribing standardized care that neglects patients’ personal circumstances and knowledge in health decisions. To make more patient centred, standard-setters are urged to involve patients the public guideline development use. Despite widespread principled support such Patient Public Involvement (PPI), underlying principles guiding PPI standardization of mired on confusion contradiction. Based literature general, informed by empirical research development, it is possible identify three rationales justify clinical standard setting. Each rationale gives rise a conceptual model which outlines distinct purpose participation, who be included, what they expected contribute. The Consumer Choice aims autonomous consumers personalize care. Democratic Voice recommendations be...

参考文章(67)
Nelly E.J. Oudshoorn, Trevor Pinch, How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies MIT Press. ,(2003)
Marilyn J. Field, Kathleen N. Lohr, Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program National Academies Press (US). ,(1990)
Marc Berg, Ruud ter Meulen, Masja van den Burg, Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis. Health Care Analysis. ,vol. 9, pp. 77- 99 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011307112091
Michiel Van Oudheusden, Brice Laurent, Shifting and Deepening Engagements: Experimental Normativity in Public Participation in Science and Technology Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. ,vol. 9, pp. 3- 22 ,(2013)
Lindsay Prior, Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health and Illness. ,vol. 25, pp. 41- 57 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1467-9566.00339
THOMAS SCHLICH, VIRGINIE J. TOURNAY, GEORGE WEISZ, ALBERTO CAMBROSIO, PETER KEATING, LOES KNAAPEN, The Emergence of Clinical Practice Guidelines Milbank Quarterly. ,vol. 85, pp. 691- 727 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1468-0009.2007.00505.X
Tiago Moreira, Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 60, pp. 1975- 1985 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2004.08.062