A systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcome of zirconia implant-restoration complex

摘要: Abstract Purpose This systematic review evaluates the clinical outcome of zirconia implant-associated survival and success rates, marginal bone loss, implant–restoration complex integrity. Study selection Using preferred reporting items for reviews meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, studies including ≥ 10 patients restored with implants supporting single crowns (SCs) or fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) prior to January 2017 were identified. Primary outcomes rates loss around one two-piece associated Results 1349 selected; after duplicate removal title screening, 36 remained full-text screening. 17 met inclusion criteria: 2 randomized controlled studies, 11 prospective 4 retrospective studies. In total, 1704 from 1002 evaluated, 1521 one-piece 183 follow-up between 1 7 years. The mean rate was 95 % (95 % CI 91–97 %). overall 0.98 mm 0.79–1.18); 1 year 0.89 mm 0.60–1.18). No regarding prosthetic possible. Conclusions Survival values year are acceptable, but long-term required support their use. particular restoration material can be recommended; this decision is apparently based on clinicians’ preferences. do not provide sufficient data use no abutment cementing materials recommended.