Patterns of human–coyote conflicts in the Denver Metropolitan Area†

摘要: In many cities throughout North America, human–coyote conflicts are an emerging problem. Little research has described temporal and spatial patterns of conflicts, although such information can be important step in developing optimizing management efforts. We used reports from 22 entities within the Denver Metropolitan Area (DMA) Colorado that provided on coyote observations (signs, sightings, encounters) (incidents, pet-attacks, human-attacks). Our objectives were to 1) define, quantify, map categories 2) investigate particularly related land cover types housing density classes. compiled 4,006 reports, including 78 signs (1.9%), 3,023 sightings (75.5%), 395 encounters (9.9%), 26 incidents (0.6%), 471 pet-attacks (11.8%), 13 human-attacks (0.3%). found a strong seasonal pattern with both highest during December–March lowest July–September. Numbers disproportionately greater open space development (in contrast natural agricultural cover) suburban areas urban, exurban, rural areas). Hotspots apparent southern region DMA, possibly because coyotes had better access development, hence interaction residents, via bordering urban areas; reporting bias may have also influenced this outcome. results will help target efforts, those focused people (e.g., education), but highlight critical need for improved methods collecting conflict standardized mechanism reduce bias. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.