Sediment Toxicity Assessment: Rationale for effect classes (5 pp)

作者: Wolfgang Ahlf , Susanne Heise

DOI: 10.1065/JSS2005.01.127

关键词:

摘要: Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Ulrich Forstner on his 65th birthday The main challenge in the application of biotests for hazard assessment sediments is a transparent interpretation, especially if combinations are applied and an integrated all results wanted. For decision making, assigning biotesting into different classes that indicate increasing hazards can be useful tool. In this paper we suggest approach how set up site-independent classification system sediment toxicity tests. About 250 samples were collected from two rivers evaluated. bioassays used standardized procedure over years. test battery include toxicological endpoints like nematode growth reproduction, algae growth, bacteria activity, luminescence inhibition. described emphasizes following steps: test-specific response spans each biotest subsequent interpretation inhibition values terms toxicity, estimation accuracy uncertainty systems, use cluster- k-means analyses order identify occurring pattern within large data base, followed by ranking. outcome 5 effect with potential hazard. represent result logical deduction. giving increased degree certainty. site independent ranking could monitoring facilitate fast interpretation. A database comprising differently contaminated precondition setting classes, because it essential know range effects variability methods. proposed then provide basic rules designing expert system.

参考文章(8)
Walter Traunspurger, Markus Haitzer, Sebastian Höss, Stefanie Beier, Wolfgang Ahlf, Christian Steinberg, Ecotoxicological assessment of aquatic sediments withCaenorhabditis elegans(nematoda) - a method for testing liquid medium and whole-sediment samples Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. ,vol. 16, pp. 245- 250 ,(1997) , 10.1002/ETC.5620160221
K. K. Kwan, B. J. Dutka, Simple two‐step sediment extraction procedure for use in genotoxicity and toxicity bioassays Environmental Toxicology & Water Quality. ,vol. 5, pp. 395- 404 ,(1990) , 10.1002/TOX.2540050407
Manon A. Vaal, Cees J. Van Leeuwen, Janneke A. Hoekstra, Joop L. M. Hermens, Variation in Sensitivity of Aquatic Species to Toxicants: Practical Consequences for Effect Assessment of Chemical Substances. Environmental Management. ,vol. 25, pp. 415- 423 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S002679910033
G. Allen Burton, Peter M. Chapman, Eric P. Smith, Weight-of-Evidence Approaches for Assessing Ecosystem Impairment Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 1657- 1673 ,(2002) , 10.1080/20028091057547
Robert K. Johnston, Wayne R. Munns, Patti Lynne Tyler, Patty Marajh-Whittemore, Kenneth Finkelstein, Kenneth Munney, Fred T. Short, Ann Melville, Simeon P. Hahn, Weighing the evidence of ecological risk from chemical contamination in the estuarine environment adjacent to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. ,vol. 21, pp. 182- 194 ,(2002) , 10.1002/ETC.5620210126
Dominic M. Di Toro, Christopher S. Zarba, David J. Hansen, Walter J. Berry, Richard C. Swartz, Christina E. Cowan, Spyros P. Pavlou, Herbert E. Allen, Nelson A. Thomas, Paul R. Paquin, Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. ,vol. 10, pp. 1541- 1583 ,(1991) , 10.1002/ETC.5620101203
Edward R. Long, Donald D. Macdonald, Sherri L. Smith, Fred D. Calder, Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments Environmental Management. ,vol. 19, pp. 81- 97 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02472006