The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA(®)) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility.

作者: Donald P. Evenson

DOI: 10.1016/J.ANIREPROSCI.2016.01.017

关键词:

摘要: Thirty-five years ago the pioneering paper in Science (240:1131) on relationship between sperm DNA integrity and pregnancy outcome was featured as cover issue showing a fluorescence photomicrograph of red green stained sperm. The flow cytometry data showed very significant difference fertile subfertile bulls men. This study utilized heat (100°C, 5min) to denature at sites strand breaks followed by staining with acridine orange (AO) measurements 5000 individual double (ds) single (ss) fluorescence. Later, protocol changed low pH breaks; acid procedures produced same results. SCSA are advantageously dual parameter 1024 channels (degrees) both Hundreds publications use test animals humans have validated highly useful for determining male breeding soundness. is rapid, non-biased cytometer machine measurement providing robust statistical exceptional precision repeatability. Many genotoxic experiments excellent dose response coefficient variation that further being powerful assay integrity. Twelve following introduction test, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated fluorescein-dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) (1993) introduced only other cytometric fragmentation. However, TUNEL can also be done light microscopy much less robustness. COMET (1998) Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD; HALO) (2003) tests were microscope don't require cytometer. Since these measure 50-200 per sample, they suffer from lack robustness measurements. Only has an exact standardization fixed protocol. many variations make it difficult compare thresholds risk factor infertility. Data four fragmentation plus (AOT) correlated various degrees.

参考文章(54)
Luke Simon, Douglas T. Carrell, Sperm DNA Damage Measured by Comet Assay Methods in Molecular Biology. ,vol. 927, pp. 137- 146 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_13
Donald P. Evenson, Richard G. Saacke, David S. Karabinus, Cheryl J. Vogler, Chromatin structural changes in sperm after scrotal insulation of Holstein bulls. Journal of Andrology. ,vol. 18, pp. 549- 555 ,(1997) , 10.1002/J.1939-4640.1997.TB01971.X
Rakesh Sharma, Jayson Masaki, Ashok Agarwal, Sperm DNA Fragmentation Analysis Using the TUNEL Assay Methods in Molecular Biology. ,vol. 927, pp. 121- 136 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_12
J. R. Greathouse, M. C. Hunt, M. E. Dikeman, L. R. Corah, C. L. Kastner, D. H. Kropf, Ralgro-implanted bulls: Performance, carcass characteristics, longissimus palatability and carcass electrical stimulation Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 57, pp. 355- 363 ,(1983) , 10.2527/JAS1983.572355X
Roy H. Hammerstedt, John P. Nolan, James K. Graham, Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. Journal of Andrology. ,vol. 11, pp. 73- 88 ,(1990) , 10.1002/J.1939-4640.1990.TB01583.X
Peter J. Stahl, Chava Cogan, Akanksha Mehta, Alex Bolyakov, Darius A. Paduch, Marc Goldstein, Concordance among sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity assays and semen parameters. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 104, pp. 56- 61 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2015.04.023
Rod Balhorn, Donald P. Evenson, Lorna K. Jost, Michele Corzett, Characteristics of human sperm chromatin structure following an episode of influenza and high fever: a case study. Journal of Andrology. ,vol. 21, pp. 739- 746 ,(2000) , 10.1002/J.1939-4640.2000.TB02142.X