Genetic susceptibility, biomarker respones, and cancer.

作者: Hannu Norppa

DOI: 10.1016/J.MRREV.2003.09.006

关键词:

摘要: Abstract A large number of studies have reported associations between polymorphisms xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) and various cancers. However, the carcinogenic exposures behind such findings usually been unclear. Information on susceptibility to specific carcinogens could better be obtained by examining situations where exposure endpoint studied are nearer in time, i.e., studying biomarkers carcinogen early (genotoxic) effect exposed humans. For example, analyses DNA adducts cytogenetic endpoints indicated an increased glutathione S -transferase M1 ( GSTM1 ) null genotype genotoxicity tobacco smoking, supporting view that with bladder lung cancer partly related smoking. In vitro human cells offer experimental tool can used, within limits cell systems, predict individual sensitivity genotype–carcinogen interactions. 1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane, epoxide metabolite 1,3-butadiene has clearly shown depend GSTT1 genotype, which also implicated modify, along 1,2-epoxy-3-butene, another 1,3-butadiene. These genotypes appear modulate excretion 1,3-butadiene-specific mercapturic acids, influence biomarker levels 1,3-butadiene-exposed workers. The acids (PHEMA) workers styrene seems one PHEMA diastereoisomer. styrene. general, genetic potentially important for response largely exposing agent, biological material examined, ethnicity population under study. Individual level may vary a lot, reliable estimate is essential correct interpretation genotype–exposure interaction. Besides XME polymorphisms, any affect cellular damage could, principle, modify genotoxins. instance, those concerning repair proteins presently being many laboratories.

参考文章(83)
Strange Rc, Fryer Aa, The glutathione S-transferases: influence of polymorphism on cancer susceptibility. IARC scientific publications. pp. 231- ,(1999)
Aage Haugen, Alan Hewer, David Ryberg, David H. Phillips, Different susceptibility to smoking-induced DNA damage among male and female lung cancer patients. Cancer Research. ,vol. 54, pp. 5801- 5803 ,(1994)
E. D. Bowman, A. M. Harrington, P. G. Shields, V. T. Doan, A. Weston, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Adducts in Human Lung and Cancer Susceptibility Genes Cancer Research. ,vol. 53, pp. 3486- 3492 ,(1993)
Peter G. Shields, Curtis C. Harris, Cancer Risk and Low-Penetrance Susceptibility Genes in Gene-Environment Interactions Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 18, pp. 2309- 2315 ,(2000) , 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2309
Houlston Rs, Glutathione S-Transferase M1 Status and Lung Cancer Risk A Meta-Analysis Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 8, pp. 675- 682 ,(1999)
P J van Bladeren, P van 't Veer, H Verhagen, G van Poppel, Markers for cytogenetic damage in smokers: associations with plasma antioxidants and glutathione S-transferase mu. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 2, pp. 441- 447 ,(1993)
Kimmo Peltonen, Hilkka Järventaus, Ari Hirvonen, Constantin Neagu, Marja Sorsa, Hannu Norppa, Sabrina Bernardini, Katarina Pelin, Induction of sister chromatid exchange by 3,4-epoxybutane- 1,2-diol in cultured human lymphocytes of different GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes Mutation Research\/environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects. ,vol. 361, pp. 121- 127 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0165-1161(96)90246-0
Blanca Laffon, Beatriz Pérez-Cadahı́a, Eduardo Pásaro, Josefina Méndez, Individual sensitivity to DNA damage induced by styrene in vitro: influence of cytochrome P450, epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase genotypes Toxicology. ,vol. 186, pp. 131- 141 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00729-1
Lisbeth E Knudsen, Steffen H Loft, Herman Autrup, Risk assessment: the importance of genetic polymorphisms in man. Mutation Research. ,vol. 482, pp. 83- 88 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00213-5