Acquisition functions in contingency judgment

作者: David R. Shanks

DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(87)90008-7

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Two experiments investigated the way in which judgments of extent to an action caused outcome changed as more experience actionoutcome contingency was presented. In first experiment increased across trials when there a positive and decreased negative contingency. noncontingent situations were biased by overall probability outcome. second changes under contingencies persisted even subjects given opportunity dissociate their causality from degree confidence those judgments. The results are at variance with dP dD theories attempt account for terms statistical rules based on probabilities or frequencies relevant events. If such modified, however, take regression subjects' estimates onto actual frequencies, then data could be accommodated. On other hand, simple associative view is also able data.

参考文章(24)
David R. Shanks, Anthony Dickinson, The role of selective attribution in causality judgment ,(1988)
Robert A Rescorla, None, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement Classical conditioning II : Current research and theory. pp. 64- 99 ,(1972)
Robin M Hogarth, None, Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 99, pp. 3- 19 ,(1986) , 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3
Harriet Shaklee, Michael Mims, Sources of error in judging event covariations: Effects of memory demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 8, pp. 208- 224 ,(1982) , 10.1037/0278-7393.8.3.208
Harriet Shaklee, Human covariation judgment: Accuracy and strategy Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 14, pp. 433- 448 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0023-9690(83)90026-7
David R. Shanks, Selective attribution and the judgment of causality Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 17, pp. 311- 334 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0023-9690(86)90001-9
Lorraine G. Allan, The Judgment of Contingency and the Nature of the Response Alternatives Canadian Journal of Psychology\/revue Canadienne De Psychologie. ,vol. 34, pp. 1- 11 ,(1980) , 10.1037/H0081013
Lorraine G. Allan, A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. ,vol. 15, pp. 147- 149 ,(1980) , 10.3758/BF03334492