Incorporating spatial population structure in gap analysis reveals inequitable assessments of species protection

作者: L. Santini , M. Di Marco , L. Boitani , L. Maiorano , C. Rondinini

DOI: 10.1111/DDI.12198

关键词:

摘要: Aim: Gap analysis measures the percentage of protected species distribution and generally compares it to a representation target (i.e. minimum area be protected). The results are used identify that need further protection, providing quantitative baseline address possible expansion given (PA) systems. However, achievement same may have different implications in terms persistence depending on population spatial structure conservation needs. aim was investigate what extent why gap provide inequitable assessments protection. Location: Europe. Methods: We performed three analyses 27 European carnivores ungulates, measuring level protection according types data: geographical ranges, habitat suitability models incorporate potential structuring populations within PAs. Results: estimated degree depends proxy adopted. When based areas able support viable (irrespective how these quantified), perceived relative changes considerably. ability persist PA systems mostly their density dispersal abilities, as well interaction between two features, which eventually determines number size populations. Main conclusions: for imply protecting numbers individuals having structures consequently lead probabilities across species. If is disregarded, thus coverage.

参考文章(41)
Carlo Rondinini, Luigi Boitani, Daniele Baisero, Piero Visconti, Moreno Di Marco, Luca Santini, Ecological correlates of dispersal distance in terrestrial mammals Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 24, pp. 181- 186 ,(2013) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-24.2-8746
M. DI MARCO, L. BOITANI, D. MALLON, M. HOFFMANN, A. IACUCCI, E. MEIJAARD, P. VISCONTI, J. SCHIPPER, C. RONDININI, A Retrospective Evaluation of the Global Decline of Carnivores and Ungulates Conservation Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 1109- 1118 ,(2014) , 10.1111/COBI.12249
Craig Groves, Frank Davis, R. Gerald Wright, J. Michael Scott, Steve Caicco, Blair Csuti, Joe Ulliman, Hal Anderson, Reed Noss, Thomas C. Edwards, GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ,(1993)
P. VISCONTI, M. DI MARCO, J. G. ÁLVAREZ-ROMERO, S. R. JANUCHOWSKI-HARTLEY, R. L. PRESSEY, R. WEEKS, C. RONDININI, Effects of errors and gaps in spatial data sets on assessment of conservation progress. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 27, pp. 1000- 1010 ,(2013) , 10.1111/COBI.12095
Curtis H. Flather, Kenneth R. Wilson, Denis J. Dean, William C. McComb, IDENTIFYING GAPS IN CONSERVATION NETWORKS: OF INDICATORS AND UNCERTAINTY IN GEOGRAPHIC-BASED ANALYSES Ecological Applications. ,vol. 7, pp. 531- 542 ,(1997) , 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0531:IGICNO]2.0.CO;2
Gianluca Catullo, Monica Masi, Alessandra Falcucci, Luigi Maiorano, Carlo Rondinini, Luigi Boitani, A gap analysis of Southeast Asian mammals based on habitat suitability models Biological Conservation. ,vol. 141, pp. 2730- 2744 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2008.08.019
OTSO OVASKAINEN, Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem. Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 218, pp. 419- 433 ,(2002) , 10.1006/JTBI.2002.3089
Clinton N. Jenkins, Lucas Joppa, Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 2166- 2174 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2009.04.016
Kerstin Jantke, Christine Schleupner, Uwe Andreas Schneider, Gap analysis of European wetland species: priority regions for expanding the Natura 2000 network Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 20, pp. 581- 605 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10531-010-9968-9
Heini Kujala, Miguel B. Araújo, Wilfried Thuiller, Mar Cabeza, Misleading results from conventional gap analysis – Messages from the warming north Biological Conservation. ,vol. 144, pp. 2450- 2458 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2011.06.023