Broadening, deepening, and governing innovation: Flemish technology assessment in historical and socio-political perspective

作者: Michiel van Oudheusden , Nathan Charlier , Benedikt Rosskamp , Pierre Delvenne

DOI: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2015.06.010

关键词: Convergence (economics)Citizen journalismKnowledge economyPoliticsKnowledge baseFlemishTechnology assessmentEconomyPublic administrationGovernmentSociology

摘要: This article examines the socio-political dynamics in evolution and development of Flemish technology assessment (TA). Broadly defined, TA encompasses activities programs that expand deepen knowledge base contemporary knowledge-based economies (KBEs), typically by including new actors (e.g. trade unions), ideas science society), rationales participatory techniques) science, technology, innovation (STI) processes. Starting from regionalization STI policy Belgium convergence around global KBE principles, exemplifies how since 1980s successive waves (early-warning, bottom-up, interactive TA) have co-evolved with generations policy. Building on these findings, it argues has counteracted accommodated dominant paradigms. By providing a historical perspective policy, draws critical attention to institutional settings societal contexts which is embedded, questions TA's strategic utility within KBEs. sheds light government's recent decision close its parliamentary institute expansion elsewhere Europe

参考文章(42)
Michel Callon, Ulrike Felt, Andy Stirling, Brian Wynne, Maria Eduardo Goncalves, Science and Governance: taking European Knowledge Society Seriously Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to DG Research. ,(2007)
Lieve Goorden, Michiel van Oudheusden, Johan Evers, Marian Deblonde, Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society: A Case for Reflective Action Research in Flanders, Belgium The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures. pp. 163- 182 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-8416-4_14
Michael Rodemeyer, Daniel Sarewitz, James Wilsdon, The Future of Technology Assessment ,(2005)
R. van Est, F. Brom, Technology Assessment, Analytic and Democratic Practice Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition). pp. 306- 320 ,(2012) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00010-7
David H. Guston, The yearbook of nanotechnology in society Springer. ,(2008)
Franz Tödtling, Philip Cooke, Patries Boekholt, The governance of innovation in Europe : regional perspectives on global competitiveness Pinter. ,(2000)
Joscha Wullweber, Nanotechnology – An Empty Signifier à venir? A Delineation of a Techno-socio-economical Innovation Strategy Science, Technology & Innovation Studies. ,vol. 4, pp. 27- 45 ,(2008)
Langdon Winner, Do Artifacts Have Politics Routledge. pp. 177- 192 ,(2017) , 10.4324/9781315259697-21
J. Grin, H. van de Graaf, R. Hoppe, Technology Assessment through interaction. A guide Working document 57. ,(1997)