Translocations and human-carnivore conflicts: problem solving or problem creating?
作者： Francisco E Fontúrbel , Javier A Simonetti , None
DOI: 10.2981/10-091
关键词: Biology 、 Natural resource economics 、 Livestock 、 Predation 、 Ecology 、 Herding 、 Chromosomal translocation 、 Carnivore
摘要: Abstract Translocation is a non-lethal practice used to manage carnivore-livestock conflicts. Nevertheless, its use has been questioned due low success rate and high cost. We performed literature review assess the effectiveness of translocation, human-related mortality estimated overall be 42% ± 6, felids were involved in 70% translocations 80% case studies conducted North America Africa. Human-related accounted for 83% deaths after translocations. cost per individual was at US$ 3,756 357 (N = 16), sum equivalent compensate up 30 livestock heads. For conservation purposes, translocation costly less effective than other alternatives such as compensation with best herding practices.
uchile.cl
sci-hub.se 参考文章(49)
L. D. Mech, Estimated costs of maintaining a recovered wolf population in agricultural regions of Minnesota Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 26, pp. 817- 822 ,(1999)
Alysa Quarforth, Timm Kroeger, Gina Schrader, Frank Casey, Suzanne Asha Stone, J. Christopher Haney, Wilderness discount on livestock compensation costs for imperiled gray wolf Canis lupus In: Watson, Alan; Sproull, Janet; Dean, Liese, comps. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress symposium; September 30-October 6, 2005; Anchorage, AK. Proceedings RMRS-P-49. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p. 141-151. ,vol. 049, ,(2007)
Philip J. Nyhus, Steven A. Osofsky, Paul Ferraro, Francine Madden, Hank Fischer, Bearing the costs of human–wildlife conflict: the challenges of compensation schemes Cambridge University Press. pp. 107- 121 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.008
Laurence G. Frank, Rosie Woodroffe, Mordecai O. Ogada, People and Wildlife: People and predators in Laikipia District, Kenya Cambridge University Press. pp. 286- 304 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.019
K. Ullas Karanth, Rajesh Gopal, People and Wildlife: An ecology-based policy framework for human–tiger coexistence in India Cambridge University Press. pp. 373- 387 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.024
Rick Eastridge, Joseph D. Clark, Evaluation of 2 soft-release techniques to reintroduce black bears Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 29, pp. 1163- 1174 ,(2001)
Dale Miquelle, Igor Nikolaev, John Goodrich, Boris Litvinov, Evgeny Smirnov, Evgeny Suvorov, People and Wildlife: Searching for the coexistence recipe: a case study of conflicts between people and tigers in the Russian Far East Cambridge University Press. pp. 305- 322 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.020
G.S.A Rasmussen, Livestock predation by the painted hunting dog Lycaon pictus in a cattle ranching region of Zimbabwe: a case study Biological Conservation. ,vol. 88, pp. 133- 139 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00006-8
JOHN D. C. LINNELL, RONNY AANES, JON E. SWENSON, JOHN ODDEN, JOHN D. C. LINNELL, Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 6, pp. 1245- 1257 ,(1997) , 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000034011.05412.CD
Rosie Woodroffe, Laurence G. Frank, Peter A. Lindsey, Symon M. K. ole Ranah, Stephanie Romañach, Livestock husbandry as a tool for carnivore conservation in Africa’s community rangelands: a case–control study Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 16, pp. 1245- 1260 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10531-006-9124-8