Large carnivore damage in Europe: Analysis of compensation and prevention programs
作者： Carlos Bautista , Eloy Revilla , Javier Naves , Jörg Albrecht , Néstor Fernández
DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2019.04.019
关键词:
摘要: Abstract The mitigation of conflicts associated with large carnivore damage to livestock and agriculture is pivotal their conservation. We evaluate current programs compensate prevent in 27 European countries the factors related economic costs these programs. Overall, high compensation are free-ranging (68% total costs) national wealth. Contrary general belief, return carnivores does not always translate into higher costs. identify a tendency towards prioritizing over prevention; only few wealthy pay majority money allocated for prevention adapt husbandry practices presence carnivores. conclude that mainly focused on paying amounts will often fail build tolerance predators. To mitigate optimize cost-effectiveness publicly funded measures, responsible agencies should be proactive, focus prevention-based policies periodically effectiveness an adaptive manner. With this purpose further solutions conflict mitigation, we call pan-European database occurrence, management actions
sci-hub.se 参考文章(48)
Brandon P. Anthony, Louise Swemmer, Co-defining program success: Identifying objectives and indicators for a livestock damage compensation scheme at Kruger National Park, South Africa Journal for Nature Conservation. ,vol. 26, pp. 65- 77 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JNC.2015.05.004
José María Rey Benayas, James M. Bullock, Vegetation Restoration and Other Actions to Enhance Wildlife in European Agricultural Landscapes Springer, Cham. pp. 127- 142 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3_7
Luigi Boitani, John D. C. Linnell, Bringing Large Mammals Back: Large Carnivores in Europe Springer International Publishing. pp. 67- 84 ,(2015) , 10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3_4
Philip J. Nyhus, Steven A. Osofsky, Paul Ferraro, Francine Madden, Hank Fischer, Bearing the costs of human–wildlife conflict: the challenges of compensation schemes Cambridge University Press. pp. 107- 121 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614774.008
A. J. Dickman, Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict Animal Conservation. ,vol. 13, pp. 458- 466 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2010.00368.X
RUTH KANSKY, MARTIN KIDD, ANDREW T. KNIGHT, Meta-analysis of attitudes toward damage-causing mammalian wildlife. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 924- 938 ,(2014) , 10.1111/COBI.12275
Özgün Emre Can, Neil D'Cruze, David L. Garshelis, John Beecham, David W. Macdonald, Resolving Human‐Bear Conflict: A Global Survey of Countries, Experts, and Key Factors Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 501- 513 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12117
Max Eriksson, Camilla Sandström, Göran Ericsson, Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves Wildlife Biology. ,vol. 21, pp. 131- 137 ,(2015) , 10.2981/WLB.00062
Géraldine Mabille, Audun Stien, Torkild Tveraa, Atle Mysterud, Henrik Brøseth, John D. C. Linnell, Sheep farming and large carnivores: What are the factors influencing claimed losses? Ecosphere. ,vol. 6, pp. art82- 17 ,(2015) , 10.1890/ES14-00444.1